APL TechLoom Tracer Review (2025)

The APL TechLoom Tracer training shoes were designed for various types of workouts and intensities (e.g., functional training, HIIT, weightlifting).

They’re noticeably lightweight, which helps immensely, especially during longer workout sessions.
In this APL tracer review article, you’ll get all the information you need regarding the design, comfort, performance, and durability.

This way, you’ll have all your questions answered (and more) so that you can make an informed decision on whether these shoes fit your mold perfectly (or not). Let’s shoe this!

 APL TechLoom Tracer

• Weight: 7.1 oz (201.3 g)
• Fit: True to size
• For: Unisex
• Upper Material: Lycra (collar) & non-stretch TechLoom
• Midsole: Propelium
• Outsole: Durable rubber, forefoot crash pad
• Best For: Functional training, HIIT, dynamic movements, weightlifting
• Price: $$$$$ 

CHECK LATEST PRICE

You have high luxury on one end and then superb performance on the other. And once both collide, you end up with the Techloom Tracer.

These Athletic Propulsion Lab sneakers were engineered to perfection – well, almost. We’ll get there. But, they are a sight to behold – both in terms of design as well as its performance and characteristics. Let’s use this APL Techloom Tracer review to cover the specifications and then we’ll give a proper dive into the whats and the hows.

With a 7.1 oz (very) lightweight, 100% vegan-friendly, and stylish training shoe, you’d think that the quality might be sub-par. But no.

The sneakers are unisex. You can pick the women’s techloom tracer and the men’s. The difference is only in sizes and fit.

The Techloom Tracer is one of the lighter training shoes available on the market. The APL sneaker comes with an 8mm heel-to-toe drop, which is good, as studies suggest that a higher heel (e.g., 6-10mm) could benefit runners (though, foot strike patterns should also be considered).

The shoe’s upper part features a non-stretch TechLoom forefoot (for lateral stability) and a Lycra collar (for flexibility and comfort around the ankle). Lateral stability in the shoe matters for sports that often require changes in direction. A secure foot with freedom of movement.

The midsole material matters a lot in running shoes. The TechLoom’s midsole is made out of Propelium which makes for a balanced cushioning and great energy return. The midsole is more durable than the traditional EVA, which helps the shoe retain its structure for far longer.

The outsole is made from durable rubber. It has strategically placed traction pads in high-wear areas (especially around the forefoot crash pad). Speaking of wear, it’s not all sunshine and roses with the Tracer shoes. There are three (significant) drawbacks, which you might not expect, considering the price tag.

The first has to do with wear. Under heavy and long-term exercise, the heel area of the shoe tends to wear (after approx. 1.5-2 years). The traction pads do not help prevent this issue. So, if you’re into heavy weightlifting for most of your workouts, then you might reconsider. 

Second are the laces. While the laces are a non-stretch upper part with a secure lacing system (meaning they won’t get loose over time), the laces themselves are too short (for some users). This depends on how high your instep is. And the final one is the price. While the price is justified, based on the amount of engineering and designing that went into them – it is still pretty steep.

The question is: Does the price justify the negatives? This is up to you to decide for yourself. But do keep in mind that other shoes get damaged, and they wear on more places than just the heel area. The durability of the TrackLooms is still very impressive nonetheless, but considering the cost, this is one that you’ll have to decide. No shoe is perfect, but this one came pretty close.

Who and What is the APL TechLoom Tracer For?

If you’re into any of the following: HIIT, functional fitness, and weightlifting; then these shoes are probably the ones you’re looking for. Just keep in mind that the shoes may not perform exceptionally well in lateral stability exercises or rope climbs (and similar movements) because of specific design limitations.

The men’s TechLoom Tracer comes with a stable structure and very balanced cushioning, which makes it ideal for versatile athletes. Regardless of whether you might be into functional fitness training, HIIT, or strength training, male/female, they’ll serve you with grace.

Even if you’re doing something that requires flexibility and lateral stability or something that requires rapid changes in movement (e.g., jumping, sprinting, circuit training), you’ll still be extremely satisfied with the TechLoom.

The 8mm heel-to-toe drop positions the foot for a more natural stance. So short-distance runners and other cardio exercises, like jogging, will be performed with ease. 

However, if you’re a long-distance runner or are running a marathon, then these shoes might not suffice (for some), as these activities usually involve the use of specialized cushioning (specialized cushioning in marathon running is not mandatory; it’s optional). 

Those who get their shoes dirty or sweaty often are also covered since you can machine wash the shoes without worry of any deterioration in durability, or damage, thanks to TechLoom’s convenient design.

Does APL run true to size? Yes. If you notice, however, that your size is out of stock, then you can pick the other gender's size. Men should add 1.5 sizes up, while women should downsize if picking men’s sizes.

Talking about design, if you’re style-conscious, know that these shoes were designed for a modern audience. Think of the APL TechLoom Tracers as the Tesla of shoes. Does that mean you’ll also have to plug them into a charging station? Of course not; not yet, anyway.

APL has designed a top-tier performance shoe while still thinking and leaning on the design, so that it appeals to its customers. And all of that, without sacrificing on quality.

To put a cherry on top, if you’re eco-conscious, then you’ll be pleased to know that on top of all the performance and slick design is also the fact that these shoes are 100% vegan-friendly.

APL TechLoom Tracer Review

The APL TechLoom Tracer Training sneakers are a modern-day blend of luxury and performance. If you’re looking to stand out and get high-end quality without having to sacrifice comfort/performance, then these shoes should definitely cause your pupils to dilate.

Let’s go through each rating aspect as well as the product details. You’ll also find any pros (and cons!) related to these shoes.

1. Durability

Durability feedback (from various consumers) is mixed. Some users swear by them, while others noticed some wear after heavy, long-term usage. The polarized reviews, though, have to do with the type of training done. For light to medium workouts they can last you for years without any wear. 

But, because of the absence of a plastic outsole insert increases the risk of the dhoe tearing during rope climbs (or similar activities). While the shoes do otherwise perform really well for most activities, when it comes to heavy/explosive movements (e.g., heavy weightlifting, sprint), they won’t endure the punishment well; but almost none of them will anyway.

2. Comfort

The Lycra collar and tongue offer noticeably exceptional comfort. The cushioning is balanced, meaning the tracers will provide you with plenty of stability, even while doing rapid direction-changing movements.

3. Support/Stability

The stable design of the forefoot helps you keep your feet secure during lateral movements. However, the narrow design of the shoe may cause slippage during exercises that require lateral stability (e.g., Cossack squats, rapid directional change movements, etc.).

These shoes do seem to be handling most functional fitness activities well, but the above-mentioned limitation may affect performance for some users.

One thing that some people with a higher instep might dislike is the relatively short laces that come with the shoe.

Also, these sneakers are one of the lighter ones out there, which helps immensely. It helps you get the feeling of being barefoot. Less weight on your foot enables you to move more easily (may reduce fatigue during workout), enables greater dexterity, and improves agility.

4. Cushioning

The midsole is made out of their trademarked Propelium. It provides balanced cushioning and rebound. This means that the shoes will remain comfy even during high-impact exercises. 

APL TechLoom Tracer Alternative

Reebok Fitness Nano X1

• Heel-to-Toe Drop: 10 mm for added cushioning and shock absorption.
• Midsole: High-rebound Phylon midsole for improved shock absorption during high-impact activities.
• Upper Material: Durable Ripstop upper for enhanced durability.
• Outsole: Luggage-style outsole for superior traction on various surfaces.
• Laces: Reflective laces for increased visibility during low-light conditions.
• Flexibility: Despite added cushioning and structure, the shoes remain flexible for versatile movement.
• Ideal Use: Designed for outdoor workouts, running, and activities in diverse conditions.

CHECK LATEST PRICE

The Reebok Fitness X1 is a sturdy training shoe alternative for the Techloom Tracers. The X1 is also designed for weightlifting and high-intensity workouts in mind. They come with a reinforced heel, which boosts stability. The flex weave upper part is both durable and breathable. However, the X1, at 10 oz, is a heavier shoe compared to the TechLoom.

Where the Reebok Fitness X1 lacks in the flexibility department compared to the Tracers, they excel in durability and grip. Unlike the tracers, which aren't really recommended for heavy weightlifting – these are. So you have to ask yourself, do you prefer functional fitness, HIIT, fast-paced movement, or heavy-load lifting?

APL TechLoom Tracer Alternative

Nike Metcon 8

• Heel-to-Toe Drop: 10 mm for added cushioning and shock absorption.
• Midsole: High-rebound Phylon midsole for improved shock absorption during high-impact activities.
• Upper Material: Durable Ripstop upper for enhanced durability.
• Outsole: Luggage-style outsole for superior traction on various surfaces.
• Laces: Reflective laces for increased visibility during low-light conditions.
• Flexibility: Despite added cushioning and structure, the shoes remain flexible for versatile movement.
• Ideal Use: Designed for outdoor workouts, running, and activities in diverse conditions.

CHECK LATEST PRICE

Out of these three, the Nike Metcon 8 probably strikes the finest balance between strength-based training and functional training. So, if you can’t make up your mind between the TechLoom and the X1, then the Metcon 8 is probably your safest bet.

The Metcon 8 has a dual-density midsole, which provides you with stability in the heel (weightlifting) and flexibility in the forefoot (agility drills). The shoes have a grippy rubber outsole, which is great for traction during intense workouts. The Metcons also come with a removable Hyberlift insert, which is great if you need that extra heel lift during squats or other heavy lifting movements.

So, which of the three is best? All three are great options. And while all three are designed to be used for similar things, some excel in one thing, while the alternative excels in the other.  

If you’re into heavy lifting, The Reebok Fitness Nano X1 is likely your best pick, and the Metcon 8 is the second best.

On the other hand, if you’re not into heavy lifting, then you can go with the Techloom Tracer, as they cover you in functional fitness, HIIT, (non-heavy) weightlifting, (non-marathon) running, and other agility/strength drills.

The Techloom Tracer leans a bit more on the agility side, while the Nike Metcon 8 strikes more towards the ideal balance. 

Agility? APL Techloom Tracer. Strength? Reebok Fitness Nano X1. Agility/Strength? Nike Metcon 8.

But basically, you’ll be fine with any of them regardless of exercise; let´s not make it too complicated.

FAQ

Is the APL TechLoom Tracer suitable for running?

You can use the TechLoom Tracer for short-distance running/sprinting. The 8mm heel-to-toe drop and balanced cushioning provide support and a more neutral foot position. Maybe you will find better options for long-distance running, but that doesn’t mean you can’t run a marathon with these.

Is the TechLoom Tracer machine washable?

Yes. Because the Tracer is machine-washable, the maintenance for them is extremely easy. This is a super feature, considering other alternatives aren’t suited for machine washing.

Conclusion

For fitness enthusiasts who prioritize style, comfort, and versatility, the TechLom Tracers are a superb choice. It has a lightweight design, balanced cushioning, and stable support. And it also performs great across most ranges of workouts, both strength and agility.

The APLs do come with limitations when it comes to lateral stability and durability during movements such as rope climbing – both of which should be considered before making the purchase.

The price, though, might be an issue (for some), but even then, it is a great investment, as well as a very quality-made training shoe. If you’re into long-distance running/marathons or heavy-weight lifting, then you may check the alternatives above, however you will be fine as well.

Now it’s your turn! Do you own, or have owned, a pair of APL Techloom Tracers? What are your thoughts and opinions? Do you have any other suggestions for alternative options, and why?

Drop a comment below, and we’d like to hear what you think and what you have to say. Any questions, thoughts, opinions, tips, or tricks about the Tracers are all welcome. Cheers!

References:

1. Shuangshuang Lin, Yang Song, Xuanzhen Cen, Kovács Bálint, Gusztáv Fekete, Dong Sun. "The Implications of Sports Biomechanics Studies on the Research and Development of Running Shoes: A Systematic Review." Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct; 9(10): 497. Published online 2022 Sep 22. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100497. PMCID: PMC9598645, PMID: 36290465, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9598645/ (accessed September 30th, 2024)
2. Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza, Fernando González-Mohíno, Jordan Santos-Concejero, Jose Maria González-Ravé. "Influence of Shoe Mass on Performance and Running Economy in Trained Runners." Frontiers in Physiology, Front Physiol. 2020; 11: 573660. Published online 2020 Sep 23. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.573660, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7538857/ (accessed September 28th, 2024)
3. Simon M. Luethi, Edward Frederick, Michael R. Hawes, Benno M. Nigg. "Influence of Shoe Construction on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Load During Lateral Movements in Tennis." International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, August 1986; 2(3):166-174. DOI: 10.1123/ijsb.2.3.166, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288043045_Influence_of_Shoe_Construction_on_Lower_Extremity_Kinematics_and_Load_during_Lateral_Movements_in_Tennis (accessed September 28th, 2024)
4. Xiaole Sun, Wing-Kai Lam, Xini Zhang, Junqing Wang, Weijie Fu. "Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance." Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Mar; 19(1): 20-37. Published online 2020 Feb 24. PMCID: PMC7039038, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039038/ (accessed September 28th, 2024)
5. Wouter Hoogkamer, Shalaya Kipp, Jesse H. Frank, Emily M. Farina, Geng Luo, Rodger Kram. "A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes." Sports Med. 2018; 48(4): 1009–1019. Published online 2017 Nov 16. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2. PMCID: PMC5856879, PMID: 29143929, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856879/ (accessed September 30th, 2024)
6. All Photos Made by Torokhtiy Media Team.